This paper discusses the spatial trends of urban physical growth of several cities in Java. Six cities in Java (Jakarta, Bandung, Semarang, Yogyakarta, Surabaya, and Malang) were chosen as samples to represent the characteristics of cities in Java based on their geographic settings, including their topography, size, population density, and history of their development. The objectives of this study were: (1) to understand the variations in physical growth of cities in Java; and (2) to explain the spatial trends of urban physical growth of these cities based on their geographic settings. Multi-temporal Landsat satellite images were chosen as data sources to identify urban morphological development processes. Based on results of analysis, it was found that the physical growth of cities in Java has had relatively diverse variations in the aspects of urban settlements, infrastructure, and urban functions. However, the diversity of urban physical growth can be simplified into four types based on the dominant form of physical development. These four types were found to be (1) a compact-rounded city that is formed by the domination of a densification process; (2) a spread-elongated city formed by the dominance of an extensification process; (3) a compact fan-shaped city that is formed by natural physical conditions; and (4) a scattered-random city formed by the domination of a leapfrogging process.
Bianchin A, Bravin L. 2004. Defining and detecting changes in urban areas. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spat Inf Sci. 35(7):466–471. https://www.isprs.org/proceedings/XXXV/congress/comm7/papers/91.pdf.
Burchell RW, Shad NA, Listokin D, Phillips H, Downs A, Seskin S, Davis JS, Moore T, Helton D, Gall M. 1998. The costs of sprawl—revisited. Transit Cooperative Research Program Report 39. Transportation Research Board. Washington, DC.
Douglass M. 1998. A regional network strategy for reciprocal rural–urban linkages: an agenda for policy research with reference to Indonesia. In: Tacoli C, editor. The Earthscan reader in rural-urban linkages. London: Routledge. p. 124–154. doi:10.4324/9781315800486-7.
Fujita M, Krugman P, Venables A. 2001. The spatial economy: cities, regions, and international trade. 1st edition. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Harvey RO, Clark WAV. 1965. The nature of economics and urban sprawl. Land Econ. 41(1):1–9.
Heimlich RE, Anderson WD. 2001. Development at the urban fringe and beyond: impacts on agriculture and rural land. doi:10.22004/ag.econ.33943.
Moeller MS. 2005. Remote sensing for the monitoring of urban growth patterns. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spat Inf Sci. XXXVI-8/W27. https://www.isprs.org/proceedings/XXXVI/8-W27/moeller.pdf.
Roca J, Burns MC, Carreras JM. 2004. Monitoring urban sprawl around Barcelona’s metropolitan area with the aid of satellite imagery. Proceedings of Geo-Imagery Bridging Continents, XXth ISPRS Congress; Istanbul, Turkey.
Seto KC, Fragkias, Guneralp B, Reilly M. 2009. Rapidly growing cities and their resilience to climate change: a meta-analysis of global trends in urban land-use change and indicators of resilience and vulnerability. IOP Conf Ser: Earth Environ Sci. 6(33):332010. doi:10.1088/1755-1307/6/33/332010.
Sun Y, Zhao S, Qu W. 2015. Quantifying spatiotemporal patterns of urban expansion in three capital cities in Northeast China over the past three decades using satellite data sets. Environ Earth Sci. 73(11):7221–7235. doi:10.1007/s12665-014-3901-6.
Theobald DM. 2001. Land-use dynamics beyond the American rural fringe. Geogr Rev. 91(3):544–564. doi:10.1111/j.1931-0846.2001.tb00240.x.
Wilson EH, Hurd JD, Civco DL, Prisloe MP, Arnold C. 2003. Development of a geospatial model to quantify, describe and map urban growth. Remote Sens Environ. 86(3):275–285. doi:10.1016/S0034-4257(03)00074-9.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2019 The Author(s)