Temporary Shelter Simulation Towards Effectiveness Value of OTTV and Thermal Comfort
Vol. 36 No. 3 (2019), Research Article
Vol. 36 No. 3 (2019)

Temporary Shelter Simulation Towards Effectiveness Value of OTTV and Thermal Comfort

Research Article
https://doi.org/10.29037/ajstd.582
Published 2019-12-27 — Updated on 2019-12-27
Dyah Puspa Ayu
Digital Object Oriented Research and Experiment Laboratory, Department of Architecture and Planning Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Jl. Grafika No. 2, Yogyakarta 55281, Indonesia
Budi Prayitno
Department of Architecture and Planning Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Jl. Grafika No. 2, Yogyakarta 55281, Indonesia
Agus Hariyadi
Department of Architecture and Planning Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Jl. Grafika No. 2, Yogyakarta 55281, Indonesia
pdf

Keywords

Temporary shelter
Transition phase
Material
OTTV
Thermal comfort
Grasshopper

Abstract

Indonesia is prone to a variety of natural disasters, one of which is earthquakes. Earthquakes are detrimental to human life, causing among other things a loss of shelter. As such, victims of earthquakes need basic assistance in the form of shelter, which the Indonesian government provides in the transition phase of emergency responses. Several innovations in the provision of temporary shelter have arisen in terms of packaging and fast unloading. This research aimed to examine the effective value of OTTV energy (overall thermal transfer value), differences in room temperature, and thermal comfort in existing temporary shelters. OTTV values and thermal comfort are adapted to Indonesia's humid tropical climate, which has a temperature ranging 24–30°C and air humidity of 75%. Temporary shelters were simulated with Rhinoceros and Grasshopper softwares. The simulation was carried out in two stages, with the first stage simulating the temporary shelter materials and the second stage simulating according to a predetermined standard. The results concluded that the effective value of OTTV with the use of Styrofoam-based shelter gives a value of 27.63 W/m2 with a decrease of up to 4.70 W/m2 and the temperature drops to 2–3°C.

https://doi.org/10.29037/ajstd.582
pdf

References

Affisa FS, Djunaedi A. 2014. The effectiveness of temporary residential areas as a media recovery of post disaster Merapi 2010 case study on temporary residential areas Plosokerep, Gondangpusung, Banjarsari, and Gondanglegi [dissertation]. [Yogyakarta]: Universitas Gadjah Mada.

Akhmad AG, Fachruddin PA. 2008. Disain rumah tinggal konstruksi “knock down” (tinjauan khusus penggunaan prefabrikasi lokal) [”Knock down” construction residence design (special review of the use of local prefabrication)]. Jurnal SMARTek. 6(1):18–28.

Boen T. 2016. Belajar dari kerusakan akibat gempa bumi: bangunan tembokan nir-rekayasa di Indonesia [Learning from the damage due to earthquake wall building without engineering in Indonesia]. Yogyakarta: UGM Press.

Hariyadi A, Fukuda H, Ma Q. 2017. The effectiveness of the parametric design ‘Sudare’ blind as external shading for energy efficiency and visibility quality in Jakarta. Archit Eng Des Manage. 13(5):384–403. doi:10.1080/17452007.2017.1296811.

Irwan M, Ekasiwi SNN, Bararatin K. 2016. Bangunan portabel sebagai solusi kebutuhan hunian temporer yang layak huni [Portable buildings as solution to the need for temporary shelter]. Jurnal Sains dan Seni ITS. 5(2). doi:10.12962/j23373520.v5i2.19043.

Karyono TH. 2013. Arsitektur dan kota tropis dunia ketiga: suatu bahasan tentang Indonesia [Architecture and third world tropical cities: discussion about Indonesia]. Depok: Rajawali Pers.

Mahira ED, Hignasari V. 2018. Konsep mandala pada rancangan limbah kontainer untuk hunian sementara korban bencana alam di Bali [The concept of mandala in the design of container waste for temporary resettlement of natural disaster victims in Bali]. Vitruvian. 7(2):77–86.

Moon JI, Lee SH. 2007. A Study on the planning method of temporary residences for refugees following a disaster: focused on Korean temporary residences. JAABE. 6(2):251–258. doi:10.3130/jaabe.6.251.

Olglay V. 2015. Design with climate: bioclimatics approach to architectural regionalism. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

Pero J. 2014. Housing the displaced. Mech Eng-CIME. 136(1):10.

Putro HP, Roychansyah MS. 2012. Pembangunan huntara pasca bencana Merapi di Kabupaten Sleman [Post-disaster shelter development in Merapi in Sleman Regency] [dissertation]. [Yogyakarta]: Universitas Gadjah Mada.

Rizal FF, Tavio TT. 2014. Desain permodelan sambungan beton precast pada perumahan tahan gempa di Indonesia berbasis knockdown system [Design of precast concrete connection modeling in earthquake resistant housing in Indonesia based on knockdown system]. Jurnal Teknik ITS. 3(1):C1–C4. doi:10.12962/J23373539.V3I1.5496.

Santoso WE, Felecia F, Panjaitan TWS. 2016. Pembuatan prototipe hunian sementara untuk pengungsi di Indonesia [Making prototype temporary protection for refugees in Indonesia]. Jurnal Titra. 4(2):235–242.

Satwiko P. 2009. Fisika bangunan [Building physics]. Yogyakarta: Andi.

Setiani AN, Harani AR, Riskiyanto R. 2017. Perhitungan Overall Thermal Transfer Value (OTTV) pada selubung bangunan [Calculation of Overall Thermal Transfer Value (OTTV) on building envelopes]. Arsir. 1(2):100–109. doi:10.32502/arsir.v1i2.879.
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2019 Array

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.